Re: RFC 231 (v1) Data: Multi-dimensional arrays/hashes and slices
[email protected] ("Jeremy Howard") Mon, 2 Oct 2000 08:25:34 +1100
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.data |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001101c02bee$2584e0d0$c1252ccb@SAMANTHA> |
Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:51:04AM +1100, Jeremy Howard wrote: > > Please no! Anything that makes it harder to write 'quick-and-dirty' scripts > > is never going to fly--this is part of what makes Perl special. > > Why? I see no problem in making -Mstrict and -Wall the defaults. > Then make '-E' option to mean what '-e' means today, and '-e' mean > > -M-strict -Wnone -E > Personally, I wouldn't mind this, but relying on this change occuring in P6 will make our RFCs pretty flimsy, because I think it is unlikely to happen. See the archives discussing RFC 6, 16, and others on perl6-language-strict: http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language-strict%40perl.org/