Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test)

[email protected] (Dan Sugalski)
Newsgroups perl.perl6.language.data
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 12:38 PM 8/25/00 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Dan Sugalski writes:
> > The operative word in that last sentence is "Currently"...
> >
> > >The problem is that you can tie() an array, but an object is a scalar.
> > >Also, there are many array operations (push, pop, etc) still not
> > >supported by tie.  tie makes assumptions about arrays that are perhaps
> > >not valid with pdls.
> >
> > Tie will have a more comprehensive implementation in perl 6, I expect. And
> > it may not be the method used to do this magic. (variable vtable functions
> > should be writable in perl)
>
>Yes, but you're handwaving.  If we don't come up with a way to address
>these issues by saying "this is what we want to be possible, this is
>how it might be done", this list will just spin and talk and discuss
>and debate without any idea of when it's done.

Sure, it's handwaving, but it's handwaving with a purpose. What I don't 
want is for people to get bogged down by the limits of what perl 5 
provides, or what looks to be some sort of reasonable extrapolation 
of  those features.

If a fully working tie's what you need, then ask for it.
If full overloading on non-objects is what you need, then ask for it.
If making objects look like non-objects is what you need, then ask for it.

Basically if you want to be able to say:

   my Matrix @foo, @bar, @baz : bounds(5,5,5);
   # init foo and bar here
   @baz = @foo * @bar;

to make foo and bar 5x5x5 matricies that you casn multiply to get baz then, 
well, say it. If that means you need to define a way to provide overridden 
operators in the Matrix package, then go for it and say that.

Let the -internals folks worry about the Weird Magic needed to implement 
what you want. (This is a variation of my standard "Don't get hung up on 
the implementation, that's my job" speech)

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.