Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test)

At 01:11 PM 8/25/00 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Heh, we're on the same page here.  I'm just setting the framework
>for that discussion.  I don't think the PDL folks yet know what
>they want, other than "better support for numerical structures".
>
>I'm trying to see what's wrong with the existing systems so that we
>can either fix them or replace them.  Walking before we run, etc.

Gotcha. Different approaches and all, I expect. I tend to figure out what I 
want and then try and shoehorn it into what I already have. :)

It looks like we need to be able to override operations on arrays, have 
multi-dimensional arrays, and do some rather odd slicing operations that 
give values still linked to the original matrices.

Has anyone asked for complex number support yet?

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk