Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.

Gads, people, I can barely go to the bathroom without getting behind on 
this discussion, let alone head out for a few hours to pick up a new laptop 
:-)  I'll try to catch up.

At 07:25 PM 8/22/00 -0600, Tony Olekshy wrote:
>Throw can't take no arguments because its a constructor, not a function.

throw is a constructor right now, but we don't need to stop us from 
suggesting it do something that constructors can't if there's a good case 
for it.  However, I don't see a good enough case for an argument-less 
try.  If there were one, it would be that it was the same as throw $@.

--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies