RE: warn (was: yoda 2)

At 10:33 AM 8/18/00 -0500, Brust, Corwin wrote:
>Hmm this gets me thinking:
>In the context of a catch block, if could @_ contain the exception stack,
>starting with the current exception, could C<warn> be modified to act of @_
>if called in void context with no arguments?

I like the idea of passing the exception stack in @_.  If we use the RFC 
63/Error.pm idea of passing the current exception in $_[0], then this falls 
out naturally, and no need to follow a linked list.  Gets my vote.

--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies