Re: errors and their keywords and where catch can return to and stuff like that
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) 14 Aug 2000 18:17:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.flow |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Let us get away from the globals as much as we can. This can easily (I think) be taken care of by having the _exception_ itself have the uncaught handler $exception = Exception::whatever->new $exception->uncaught_handler = CODEREF <chaim> >>>>> "JM" == James Mastros <[email protected]> writes: JM> My proposal is: JM> $Exception::<whatever>::onuncaught = CODEREF. JM> Yes, this is a global. It has to be; the definition of when/how this gets JM> called is that if the unwind stack goes all the way /past/ the root of the JM> code, this code ref gets called. The only parameter is the exception. The JM> defalut would be sub {die shift;} (for "obviously" fatal things), which JM> would make the program exit with a fatal exception. Other normal choices JM> would be undef, ignore it (non-defualt warnings, like bareword), and sub JM> {warn shift;}, print out a warning message (default warnings, like... I JM> can't think of any). JM> The value of onuncaught should follow isa if it doesn't exist. -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [email protected] +1-718-236-0183