Re: RFC: Safe Signals

Please explain how any of this will make signals safer?

Safer signals is a core issue. Not a language issue. Whatever mechanism
you select it will not make signals safer.

This is appropriate here in -language(-flow) if you want to change the
user level interface. Otherwise, it belongs in -core.

Perhaps this RFC should simply be renamed. "New singal handling
metaphor" or whatever.

<chaim>

>>>>> "UG" == Uri Guttman <[email protected]> writes:

UG> =head1 TITLE

UG> Safe Signals

UG> =head1 VERSION

UG>     Maintainer: Uri Guttman <[email protected]>
UG>     Date: 07 Aug 2000
UG>     Version: 1
UG>     Mailing List: perl6-language-flow
UG>     Number: TBD

-- 
Chaim Frenkel					     Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[email protected]				               +1-718-236-0183