Re: Internal Filename Representations (was Re: Summary of I/O related RFCs)

> > Splitting apart or putting together either one of these paths is trivial
> 
> I think it's far from trivial, especially if you want to take into
> account network names, file versions, protection attributes and ACLs, ...

Access details like this are largely independent of the logical
manipulations made with pathnames.  I can claim that there is
"/foo/bar/zap.txt" and I can say that file directory part is
"/foo/bar", but whether such an entity really exists, is a different
matter.

> -- Johan

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen