Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print operator

Jon Ericson wrote:
> 
> I think this is a little premature.  These are Requests For Comments not
> Suggestions To Larry yet.  So far, you have been to only person to offer
> constructive criticism on this RFC.  I think that it is a very small win
> at the moment, but this is not the RFC's final form yet.  If this RFC is
> a bad idea, you won't have to beat me into submission.  The idea is not
> ambitious, but that doesn't mean that it's bad.

Fair enough. My only concern is bandwidth, both for us and Larry. I just
worry about handing Larry 300 RFC's, only 100 of which we really feel
are "big wins". I wasn't trying to rush people, and any type of
"deadline" is still far off.

> > Just trying to do my job as chair of this list. :-)
> 
> Thank you for doing such a fine job.

Awww, shucks, you're making me blush! :-) Thanks.

Cheers,
Nate