Re: RFC 39 (v2) Perl should have a print operator
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") Fri, 18 Aug 2000 00:00:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.io |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Missouri - Kansas City supercomputing infrastructure |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
sub p{
print "Debug: @_\n";
@_;
};
Solved my problem :)
Nathan Wiger wrote:
>
> I think [a print() that returns the value of what you
> printed ] is an excellent idea independent of others and should
> probably be RFC'ed separately. Since it does not have dependencies on
> other RFC's and can be implemented separately, it should probably be in
> its own RFC.
>
> You should probably consider whether this is useful for warn, write, or
> other output functions as well.
>
> -Nate
The people who pay me have been getting antsy, as I have been letting things
slide while working 14 hour days on perl6 RFCs.... Won't someone else write
an RFC for this if they think it makes sense?
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187 [email protected]
Does despair.com sell a discordian calendar?