Re: RFC 171 (v1) my Dog $spot should call a constructor implicitly
[email protected] (Piers Cawley)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.objects |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hildo Biersma <[email protected]> writes: > Many people see even this as a bad choice, saying that 'explicit' should > be the default, and that C++ constructors should be marked 'implicit' > for this behavior to be allowed. Hmmm... having 'explicit' be implicit and vice versa? I think my head may be about to start spinning. Thank ghod I don't do C++. -- Piers