Re: perl6-language-objects Report 31 Aug 2000

Nathan Wiger <[email protected]> writes:
> =head2 RFC 137 (v1): Perl OO should I<not> be fundamentally changed
> (Damian Conway)
> 
> This RFC explored several extensions to current Perl OO in order to make
> it more powerful, without sacrificing its current simplicity or
> flexibility. Unfortunately, I think most people interpreted this as a
> simple philosophy RFC because of the title, when in fact it was a very
> thorough document, so little discussion was recorded. I recommend
> renaming it.

In at least one case, the reason that this RFC elicited no comment was
simply I couldn't think of anything to say beyond "Hear, hear!"

-- 
Piers