Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a constructor implicitly

On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:

> Damian Conway <[email protected]> writes:
> >   > > But I agree that anything beyond that is simply horrible. You'll only
> >   > > drive more people *away* from OO, because it generates so horribly
> >   > > inefficient code. If you want a constructor called, than FGS *call* a
> >   > > constructor. Maybe you can reduce the syntax necessary to do that, but
> >   > > please don't do it behind our backs.
> >   > 
> >   > Well then, that's one nay vote.  :)
> >
> >Make that two.
> 
> Three.

I was hoping to be strike three!

Four.

David