Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a constructor implicitly

Damian Conway <[email protected]> writes:

>    > > But I agree that anything beyond that is simply horrible.
>    > > You'll only drive more people *away* from OO, because it
>    > > generates so horribly inefficient code. If you want a
>    > > constructor called, than FGS *call* a constructor. Maybe you
>    > > can reduce the syntax necessary to do that, but please don't
>    > > do it behind our backs.
>    > 
>    > Well then, that's one nay vote.  :)
> 
> Make that two.

Three. But I think Michael already knew about mine and forgot to count
it.

-- 
Piers