Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods
[email protected] (Damian Conway) Thu, 7 Sep 2000 10:57:05 +1100 (EST)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.objects |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >That seems reasonable--except that I don't believe exists() merits > >any special treatment. > > More specifically, I think all non-lvalue context use of -> should be > non-autoviv, whether exists or anything else. I agree entirely. In fact, I shall extend RFC 128 to allow subroutine parameter to specify that they are non-autovivifying. Damian