Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like"with" or "express"
[email protected] (Markus Peter)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.objects |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, David L. Nicol wrote:
> And you dont have to make sure the $s on the left of the names match
> the {}s on the right, just use one $ and string the names together with
> backslashes. This is not easier?
>
>
> $one{two} is $one\two
> $$one{two}{three} is $one\two\three
> $$$one{two}{three}{four} is $one\two\three\four
Sounds nice
> If we have _that_ already,
>
> with %one\two {
>
> push @\three\four, 5,6;
>
> }
In combination with the above possibility this makes real sense, so forget
my objections about the backslash....
--
Markus Peter
[email protected]