RE: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like " with" or "express"

[email protected] ("Brust, Corwin")
Newsgroups perl.perl6.language.objects
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Lateur [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pascal-like
"with" or "express"


On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:03:48 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote:

>Normally what you'd say is:
>
>  with (%record) {
>    ....
>  }
>
>(look at me, using Larry's new ... operator :-)

No you didn't. You typed four dots.

-- 
	Bart.
Hmmm 

	... . ...;

or maybe:
	
	while (... .. ...) {
		q(can't touch this!)
	}
	

-Corwin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.