Re: Overlapping RFCs 135 138 164
[email protected] ("Stephen P. Potter")
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.regex |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Mark-Jason Dominus <[email protected]> whis pered: | | RFC135: Require explicit m on matches, even with ?? and // as delimiters. | | RFC138: Eliminate =~ operator. | | RFC164: Replace =~, !~, m//, and s/// with match() and subst() | | I would like to see these three RFCs merged into one if this is | appropriate. I am calling on the three authors to discuss in private You can add "RFC 156: Replace first match function (C<?...?>) with a flag to the match command" to that list. I'd be happy to withdraw my RFC if it was folded into a combined RFC. -spp