Re: Overlapping RFCs 135 138 164
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.language.regex |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sun Microsystems |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > > RFC135: Require explicit m on matches, even with ?? and // as delimiters. This one is along a different line from these two: > RFC138: Eliminate =~ operator. > RFC164: Replace =~, !~, m//, and s/// with match() and subst() Which I could see unifying. I'd ask people to wait until v2 of RFC 164 comes up. It may well include everything from RFC 138 already. -Nate