Re: C<strict> as default (was Re: RFC 16 (v1))

> I hate suggesting work, but it sounds like you've got a really good
> handle on this. The current RFCs (6 and 16) only address whether or not
> strict should be on or off. Do you have any interest in writing an RFC
> that fully details how we could fundamentally change the way variables
> are scoped? 

No, I'm going to Las Vegas on Monday and I don't have time.
I also haven't thought it through.

Feel free to use, modify, distribute, etc. any of the notes that I've
sent so far.