Re: C<strict> as default (was Re: RFC 16 (v1))

On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 10:15:32AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Don't make me field calls like this, PLEASE. Perl already has the
> ability to turn strict on for projects where it's needed. If you can't
> trust one of your programmers to type:
>    use strict;
>    use warnings;
> How can you trust *any* of the code they produce?!?! 

Because perl is for the lazy. I want an easy way to arrange for all my
programs to run under strict/warnings, should that be my inclination.

Can't we make everyone happy by making it a build-time option?