Re: RFC 238 (v1) length(@ary) deserves a warning

[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) Sat, 16 Sep 2000 01:33:04 -0400

Newsgroups	perl.perl6.language.subs
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 04:21:15PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
>    > I'm surprised there hasn't be a good overhaul of the prototyping
>    > system proposeed yet. 
> 
> What exactly didn't you like about RFC 128???

Ummm... the fact that its title doesn't match /proto/.  My bad.

Okay, its a proposal to overhaul prototyping, cool.  But I don't see
anything to allow C<length $string> and C<length @array> live
together.  Its a big RFC, I probably missed it.

-- 

Michael G Schwern      http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/      [email protected]
Just Another Stupid Consultant                      Perl6 Kwalitee Ashuranse
Cheating is often more efficient.
        - Seven of Nine