Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters

On Aug 7,  3:23pm, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Hate to just write a "useless" me too on this one, but I agree with
> Bart. Dropping the prefixes doesn't look like Perl at all, and is really
> inconsistent.

I agree that it's not ideal, but I was trying to strike a similarity
with the current style of passing named parameters as a hash ref or
naked list.  e.g.

    mysub({ first => 1, second => 2 });
or
    mysub( first => 1, second => 2 );

See, no prefixes!  I'm not saying it's perfect but I would still suggest
that it's not as alien to Perl as one might initially think.

Thanks for the comments, anyway.  All are duly noted.



A


-- 
Andy Wardley <[email protected]>   Signature regenerating.  Please remain seated.
     <[email protected]>   For a good time: http://www.kfs.org/~abw/