Re: RFC 97 (v1) prototype-based method overloading

[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons) Thu, 17 Aug 2000 20:06:20 +0000
Newsgroups perl.perl6.language.subs
Message-ID <E13PVvg-0006qA-00@roam1>
Peter Buckingham <[email protected]> writes:
>
>There are a couple of reasons for overloading. simple arithmetic operations, you
>can use plus(int, int), plus(float, float). another approach is to use
>genericity like in eiffel, and the templates in C++, which is probably better in
>the sense that you only have one function ie plus(<type>, <type>).

And of course perl has plus(<type>,<type>) as its default ;-)

If that is "better" why are we suggesting we change it ?

-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons