Re: Backwards compatibility and release 1.0

* Elizabeth Mattijsen ([email protected]) [151015 10:43]:
> FWIW, I’m with FROGGS on this.
>   use variables :D;

In the first response to this message, Moritz spoke about
     use invocant :D;
 and use parameters :D;

Three different things?

> at the top of the scope of your code, and then you’re set.  I admit
> it feels a *little* like the “use strict” boilerplate of Perl 5.

It is.

> On the other hand, I think by just specifying a type *without* smiley,
> is already so much better than the situation in Perl 5 that the lacking
> strictness of :D will not be needed much to catch programming / garbage
> in type of errors anyway.

Much better, of course.  Programming languages are used by people
of different taste.  Some may find "much better" enough, other people
want more.
-- 
Regards,

               MarkOv

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Mark Overmeer MSc                                MARKOV Solutions
       [email protected]                          [email protected]
http://Mark.Overmeer.net                   http://solutions.overmeer.net