Re: An attempt to be constructive
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:36:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.licenses |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p04320405b5e1cb38b727@[192.168.0.77]> |
At 16:32 -0700 2000.09.10, Russ Allbery wrote: >In more of an attempt to be constructive, what if we identify the key >aspects to the AL that people like and then, for Perl 6, find legal >counsel to review and help draft a precise legal license with those key >features? I think that's a good idea, even if only as an intellectual exercise (though ideally it could prove to be more than that). >Surely there must be someone in the Perl community with either >intellectual property law experience or a willingness to chip in to a fund >to hire an intellectual property lawyer? The aspect of preserving the >name of the package is fairly unique to the AL; Yes, and it is its most important unique feature, to me. -- Chris Nandor [email protected] http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network [email protected] http://osdn.com/