Deadline for all RFCs? If so, why?
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:26:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta,perl.perl6.licenses |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have just learned of the RFC "freeze or die" deadline of 25 September 2000 (ok, I am behind on my email. :) I am curious if this applies to any Working Groups besides perl6-language. As chair of the Licensing Working Group, I am a bit concerned that we haven't developed enough possible licensing proposals. I am happy to hustle everyone to write more RFCs and get proposals on the table, but the deadline does seem a bit arbitrary for anything but the language design itself. Larry, did you want to decide licensing issues by 1 October 2000 as well? And, as for internals, it seems like that group will just get started when the language freezes, so there doesn't seem any reason to freeze internals-RFCs by the deadline, either. So, it'd probably be good if we changed some of the deadlines on the various working groups to reflect reality. Comments? -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5x/YZ53XjJNtBs4cRAkSfAJsH2nvHkDELgfqeNVsQxtj58g75TQCdFCEj b86UqXeqvl5WvwoMDVtxJhc= =s9jd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----