Re: RFC idea
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Sat, 30 Sep 2000 03:15:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.licenses |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Grabbing an old thread...] Ben Tilly wrote: > My understanding is that the intent of the AL is to keep there from > being a proprietary derivative named perl with restricted source. (If it > is not named perl then that is explicitly allowed.) I believe my draft of the Artistic License does the best it can to reach this goal. I have seen few comments on it, though. Ben, how do you feel about it? Chris? -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE51ZMW53XjJNtBs4cRAmi7AKCRO7rGveYjjb61aMv1YoAWtBtwKQCcDt9z LB2W/sglAsCHJYmZxcTrPy4= =PGV7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----