Re: licensing issues

[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Tue, 9 Jan 2001 00:59:06 -0500

Newsgroups	perl.perl6.licenses
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

--3ioKt2kN+IccB5F4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Chris Nandor <[email protected]> wrote:
 
> True, unless we stick to the same licensing scheme we have today for perl,
> which, like it or not, has served Perl very, very well.

As it turns out, this isn't an RFC under consideration by Larry, AFAIK.  The
only RFC about licensing that went in was (Artistic-2.0|GPL).

-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

--3ioKt2kN+IccB5F4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6Wqiq53XjJNtBs4cRAgAoAJkBXFDyclAqjJQnFohlfkzty7GzDACgppR7
qNM5vKPfBxzivA/4QhqhDu0=
=IFXD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3ioKt2kN+IccB5F4--