Re: licensing issues

[email protected] (Chris Nandor) Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:55:39 -0500

Newsgroups	perl.perl6.licenses
Message-ID	<p05010406b680e4b25db8@[10.0.1.177]>

At 0:59 -0500 2001.01.09, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
>Chris Nandor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> True, unless we stick to the same licensing scheme we have today for perl,
>> which, like it or not, has served Perl very, very well.
>
>As it turns out, this isn't an RFC under consideration by Larry, AFAIK.
>The only RFC about licensing that went in was (Artistic-2.0|GPL).

Right.  Not many RFCs said "don't change anything."  That doesn't mean
anything, though.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [email protected]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [email protected]     http://osdn.com/