Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)

[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:08:07 -0500
Newsgroups perl.perl6.licenses
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--i7KuaXCIU0jY0Ayu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Ben Tilly <[email protected]> wrote:

> They were shipping something that they marketed as Perl, which behaved
> differently than Perl, had been integrated into other projects, and for
> which Larry Wall had little or no input.

Controling this sort of behavior with a copyright license is very difficult,
as has been discussed here.  I have tried to do my best in the Artistic-2.0
to mitigate this problem as much as it can be mitigated via copyright law,
but we'll never have a perfect solution.

The better solution is to have a trademark on the word "Perl", in Larry's
name, and have the trademark license require that if they call it "Perl", it
really is the canonical Perl implementation.  (I believe I wrote an RFC that
proposed this; it's presumably currently under Larry's advisement).

-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

--i7KuaXCIU0jY0Ayu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6YiNH53XjJNtBs4cRAgmmAKCIp23FW6eItVlHBeMcfrpkXmrHIgCfWv1K
rHeRgtIVa/svrw0Gl8E2ovM=
=0NA3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--i7KuaXCIU0jY0Ayu--