Making sure "Perl" means "Perl" (was Re: licensing issues)
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:08:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.licenses |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--i7KuaXCIU0jY0Ayu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Ben Tilly <[email protected]> wrote: > They were shipping something that they marketed as Perl, which behaved > differently than Perl, had been integrated into other projects, and for > which Larry Wall had little or no input. Controling this sort of behavior with a copyright license is very difficult, as has been discussed here. I have tried to do my best in the Artistic-2.0 to mitigate this problem as much as it can be mitigated via copyright law, but we'll never have a perfect solution. The better solution is to have a trademark on the word "Perl", in Larry's name, and have the trademark license require that if they call it "Perl", it really is the canonical Perl implementation. (I believe I wrote an RFC that proposed this; it's presumably currently under Larry's advisement). -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn --i7KuaXCIU0jY0Ayu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6YiNH53XjJNtBs4cRAgmmAKCIp23FW6eItVlHBeMcfrpkXmrHIgCfWv1K rHeRgtIVa/svrw0Gl8E2ovM= =0NA3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i7KuaXCIU0jY0Ayu--