Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)

At 15.32 -0700 01.14.2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Chris Nandor writes:
>> >(Indeed, it is quite unfortunate that there are so many modules on CPAN
>> >that have chosen Artistic-only or GPL-only.)
>>
>> I think it is unfortunate that anyone would think someone else's choice of
>> license is unfortunate.  :)
>
>I can't even remember the topic we're supposed to be discussing, but
>I'm pretty sure that this would begin a tangent :-)
>
>Brad, are we trying to come to a conclusion or is this just babble?

Seeing as how the RFC process is done, I don't think there is a conclusion
to be had in this forum, at this point.

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [email protected]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [email protected]     http://osdn.com/