Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: licensing issues)

--JlTbA3Haw0yys8Mj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Nathan Torkington <[email protected]> wrote:

> Brad, are we trying to come to a conclusion or is this just babble?

My impression of the current discussion is that primarily people are
clarifying what RFCs were put in place, and what the impact will be.

Some of the discussion has been off-topic, but if people are unclear about
why the RFCs were written as they were, then it's worth discussing it.

-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

--JlTbA3Haw0yys8Mj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6Y21C53XjJNtBs4cRAv9cAJ4kb6abHHRMJ1BbGW7MgkPfUvVvTwCg0fyy
MgAvFJ6V5lpsC/f1XlCyalQ=
=BH/Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JlTbA3Haw0yys8Mj--