Re: licensing issues
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:46:54 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.licenses |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--VKJFXISuNJ854Vx5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps we want a Perl Manifesto that lays out our base goals in plain > English, separate from any licensing scheme. FWIW, I tried to at least state the goals in plain English of the *Artistic License only* in the Preamble of proposed AL-2.0. Of course, that's only half the manifesto, since we choose a dual license. I don't know if the Preamble I wrote if perfect, because I got very little feedback on it, and all the RFCs this group submitted. Those last two weeks before RFC's were due, the traffic on this list was basically dead, except for me posting revisions of RFCs. I hope that I properly caught the spirit of the consensus properly, but without feedback, that was a hard job. -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn --VKJFXISuNJ854Vx5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6Y2/O53XjJNtBs4cRAkv3AJoCDnbwPm9UmZUKa85T5C/fGjKL2ACfeM2s pZ4KM9R6LRT/kL9e+osD2Ck= =fqKw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VKJFXISuNJ854Vx5--