Re: licensing issues

[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:46:54 -0500
Newsgroups perl.perl6.licenses
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--VKJFXISuNJ854Vx5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:

>   Perhaps we want a Perl Manifesto that lays out our base goals in plain
> English, separate from any licensing scheme.

FWIW, I tried to at least state the goals in plain English of the *Artistic
License only* in the Preamble of proposed AL-2.0.  Of course, that's only
half the manifesto, since we choose a dual license.


I don't know if the Preamble I wrote if perfect, because I got very little
feedback on it, and all the RFCs this group submitted.  Those last two weeks
before RFC's were due, the traffic on this list was basically dead, except
for me posting revisions of RFCs.  I hope that I properly caught the spirit
of the consensus properly, but without feedback, that was a hard job.


-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

--VKJFXISuNJ854Vx5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6Y2/O53XjJNtBs4cRAkv3AJoCDnbwPm9UmZUKa85T5C/fGjKL2ACfeM2s
pZ4KM9R6LRT/kL9e+osD2Ck=
=fqKw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VKJFXISuNJ854Vx5--