Re: Critique available
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:42:41PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote: > > > When an article > > in perl.com is so overwhelmingly negative about the work so far, do Yup. I can't see www.sun.com carrying an editorial saying effectively "Java: we are all going to hell in a handbasket". Well, maybe they are, precisely because of Java, but that's not the point here... > > you think that stirs confidence in what we're doing? > > To strive for balance, I think perl.com's home page should also have the > links to Larry's ALS talk and slides. I know they are not a polished Definitely. > collection of web pages, but they are still quite readable. They also > give a different perspective to the RFC collection. > > An article emphasizing positive aspects of the process so far would also > seem like a nice idea, but somebody'd have to write it :-). I think I will try my hand at this. > -- > Andy Dougherty [email protected] > Dept. of Physics > Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042 -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen