Re: Critique available
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:11 AM 11/2/00 -0500, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: >My critique of the Perl 6 RFC process and following discussion is now >available at > > http://www.perl.com/pub/2000/11/perl6rfc.html The biggest issue I have with this (and had the first time around) is the complaint about the IMPLEMENTATION section. Bluntly, I would really rather there have been none included in the language RFCs and, for the ones that had them, I rather liked Damian's "this space intentionally left blank" ones. We have no infrastructure to build on. Whinging about a lack of implementation details seems rather inappropriate. Ideas are nice, but I expect most of the recommended implementations (if we got them) would've been tossed out or wildly modified anyway, and it just annoys folks to ignore things we've asked for. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [email protected] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk