Re: Critique available
[email protected] (Kirrily "Skud" Robert)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:14:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 06:08 PM 11/2/00 +0000, Simon Cozens wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:44:50AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > Firstly, now, for the first time in the Perl history, we opened up the > > > floodgates, so the speak, and had at least some sort of (admittedly) > > > weakly formalized protocol of submitting ideas for enhancement, > > > instead of the shark tank known as perl5-porters. > > > >perl6-language was not a shark tank? > > Not in the p5p sense, at least. Regardless of the levels of disapproval, > generally the disapproval was voiced with at least some courtesy. p5p is > rather less polite about things. I, for one, consider this to be a feature, not a bug. K. -- Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [email protected] - http://infotrope.net/ "Darkly hinting of head hitting desk" -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-05