Re: "Art Of Unix Programming" on Perl

Kirrily Skud Robert writes:
> Wasn't he meant to be keeping us up to date with snippets of what he's
> doing/thinking about?  I recall Nat posting a couple of months ago that
> he'd talked to Larry and Larry had said he'd do this.

I think the problem is that the RFCs aren't really a list of the
things he has to consider.  The RFCs illustrate areas of potential
change (REs, OO, little language extensibility) that are all
overlapping to some extent.  This, I think he's discovered, doesn't
lend itself to periodic updates.

Nat