Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:42:05 +0000
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta,perl.qa,perl.perl5.porters |
|---|---|
| Organization | Paul Ingram Group, Software Systems, +44 1 483 862800 |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Chris Nandor wrote: > At 15:45 +0000 2001.02.19, Tim Bunce wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > >> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: > >> > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name. > >> > > > >> > > Likewise. What's wrong with builders? > >> > > >> > Same here. Testers? > >> > >> perl-builders? > > > >Or to be more whimsical: > > > > perl-night-shift > > perl-night-build > > > >It probably needs a name that'll both indicate its role and avoid confusion > >with 'porters' (who do most of the 'building' to the untrained eye). > > I dunno; I dislike smoking, but I like the idea of "smoking-camels" or > something. :) Umm, I recall something from my geography lessons about nomadic tribes smoking camel dung. I can't remember now if it was on the fire or in the mouth (yeach). Anyway... perl-dung perl-droppings Umm, maybe not. Er... perl-smoke-trail (thinking of the night-by-night progress, kind'a) I dunno. I'm off... Tim.