Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
[email protected] ("David Grove") Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:11:13
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta,perl.qa,perl.perl5.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"H.Merijn Brand" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name. > > > > Likewise. What's wrong with builders? Because "PerlBuilder" is a commercial product. It's a poor quality competitor that I wouldn't recommend to anybody. If you put the words together like this, you'll create an accidental association. p