Re: State of PDD 0

At 01:05 PM 2/20/2001 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Tuesday 20 February 2001 11:22, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > D'oh! Yes, mark it as Approved, or whichever step is past developing.
>(I'm
> > a little scattered at the moment, so I don't have the doc handy)
>
>Actually, now that I've been updating this, I'm going to hold it at
>development for a little while, if only because I have some more changes
>coming down the pike.  (The actual formatting will stay the same, so I
>guess Simon would call these meta-meta-meta changes.)

Fair enough. PDD 0, version 2... :)

>Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there
>be a new one (perl-pdd)?

Let's use perl-rfc for now.

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk