Re: State of PDD 0

On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:15:56PM -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Bryan C. Warnock writes:
> > Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there 
> > be a new one (perl-pdd)? 
> 
> I'm in favour of renaming to reflect the new use of the list.  Dan?

How about two lists?

I still think that there should be a two-tiered process. I think its a mistake
to have a 'one size fits all' process. See my other post on this.

Ed