Re: State of PDD 0

At 02:38 PM 2/20/2001 -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > > > Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or 
> will there
> > > > be a new one (perl-pdd)?
> > >
> > >I'm in favour of renaming to reflect the new use of the list.  Dan?
> >
> > I've been thinking since I sent my last mail on this that we might 
> actually
> > want to leave the two (PDD & RFC) separate. Keep on with the RFCs for
> > 'external' things, and PDD for the actual internals implementation of 
> things.
>
>I have created perl6-announce-pdd. Mail [email protected]
>for clues.
>
>How should the submission process work? As for the RFC's?

Sounds good to me.

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk