Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)

[email protected] (Simon Cozens) Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:11:03 +0000
Newsgroups perl.perl6.meta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:39:25PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> The current RFCs need work.

Be assured that they're getting lots of top-quality work.

> There are new RFCs that could be written. Its totally counter-productive to

... ship a specification to a designer, and then keep adding more and more new
requests to change it. Don't you just *hate* that when people change the
specifications while you're half way through writing a project? Don't do it to
Perl's design.

-- 
COBOL is for morons.
		-- E.W. Dijkstra