Re: perl5 to perl6
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) Fri, 11 May 2001 17:20:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:02:39PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Nathan Torkington <[email protected]> writes: > >So now the changes are too SMALL, and we should have a language that > > is completely different so that you won't be confused when you edit > > different scripts? > > Speaking as someone that has often had to work on C, Perl, Verilog and VHDL > at the same time I can say that clearly visible differences are not without > merit. Yea, verily. I have more than once stared for more seconds than I care to admit being completely baffled at why my C compiler doesn't appreciate print "foo = $foo\n"; > > > >Nat > -- > Nick Ing-Simmons > who is looking for a new job see http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/ -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen