Re: perl 6 mailing lists status

At 02:24 PM 5/27/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Bryan C. Warnock writes:
>I'd like to see activity on the topics behind:
>  * perl6-stdlib
>  * perl6-build
>Dan, Graham--should these lists persist in their current form?

Got me, as I'm not on either set.

>It looks like the perl6-internals-api-{embed,parser,syntax-tree} lists
>represent too much fragmentation, and that the perl6-internals list is
>where that discussion will take place.  Dan?

Yeah, those can go. One of those "Seemed like a good idea at the time" things.

>We'd need Chip's okay to close the Topaz list.  I don't know what he
>would like to do with it.

Is Chip back from Saturn, then? :)


					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk