Re: CVS: Ugh
[email protected] (Bennett Todd) Wed, 5 Apr 2000 12:20:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--JXIfCS7bRbXXQ4Z5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 2000-04-05-12:01:13 John Porter: > OTOH, saying CVS is in any way like Windows makes me want > to avoid it... I think that was the intent. Unfortunate, too; I think CVS is a superb tool. It's not perfect, and it doesn't do everything there is --- or try to. What's more, it's not especially user-friendly. But I really like its balance of complexity -vs- functionality; I like the way it exposes as much as you want of its underpinnings. By sticking strictly to a directory heirarchy of RCS files, it may end up with limitations that turn icko when you want to rename things (although create and remove isn't an awful way of handling it). But it retains lovely compatibility with other tools. I find CVS a _really_ robust foundation onto which to layer other tasks. I check every backup of my pocket computer (was an HP LX, is now a Palm) into a CVS tree right after I take it, automatically from the same script. I park a CVS tree in the scripted data flow between staging and production webservers. I think the implication that CVS is like Windows is pretty much pure flame-bait. In fact, if you were gonna claim that a version control system is like Windows, wouldn't it make more sense to look for a proprietary system, distributed in binary form only, whose innards are undocumented and inaccessible? -Bennett --JXIfCS7bRbXXQ4Z5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE462fYL6KAps40sTYRAVeZAJ49haQkQcdRqYknS6DXnmXoNhnDvwCghH0E yMupJ6EPbjaWsfDA4R4XPrQ= =DXLa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JXIfCS7bRbXXQ4Z5--