RE: JVM implementation
[email protected] ("Dickerson, Monty W.") Thu, 6 Apr 2000 10:06:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
JPL is not a suitable replacement for Jpython; Perhaps Bradley Kuhn will have something nice, someday. But in posting here I was inquiring to see if there was interest or vision among perl6 peoples in making a JVM implementation of perl6. I've been hacking in perl5 for some years now, but I'm becoming more of a Servlet guy because I like the discipline Java imposes, and I like the full support of modern computer science/ software construction methodology. I just read a very nifty editorial in the Java Developers Journal on the MERIT of glue/scripting languages tho: Java, although superior for large programs, and software construction by teams composed of dissimilar programmers; is NOT a glue language - (being staticly typed & not interpreted). Java needs glue; perl-xml can be that glue; else perl can/will lose ground for the next one to five years, probably losing its place as the most popular CGI programming language. md > From: Stephen Zander [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 > Subject: Re: JVM implementation like Jpython? > > Monty, you want the jpl project or more accurately Bradley Kuhn's > <URL:mailto:[email protected]> work for his Master's thesis. Send mail to > [email protected] for more information. > > Bradley's stuff is still pretty alpha.