Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of metadata? (was Re: code repository)

--UZg4IblDW+SBJeEe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Adam Turoff wrote:

> *: Sarathy tells me that Perforce sucks at maintaining thousands of
> anonymous checkouts, while CVS doesn't mind at all.  This is a perfect
> reason to use anon CVS vs. Perforce, but does not require that Perforce be
> ditched in favor of CVS, only that an anon CVS gateway be maintained.

Will this anonymous gateway have all the relevant meta-data?  Will it look,
to a user of the gateway, like the live repository is CVS when they go
hunting through metadata?

-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

--UZg4IblDW+SBJeEe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5uQYe53XjJNtBs4cRAniUAKCATJnMcWCUQdecoXWS8eHlK80jSQCfXy6l
qv3Z2Og703Djz3MSbEZRbWA=
=T671
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UZg4IblDW+SBJeEe--