Re: Perl 6 modules plan
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:45:26 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.stdlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 03:39 PM 8/9/2001 -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote: >=head1 THINGS THAT NEED DOING Add to this "Define required metadata for perl modules". I think Larry wants version and author as required at the very least. FWIW, my current view of "The Module Plan" is for all modules to be identifiable via a module name/author ID/version triple. That's what the interpreter will use to distinguish internally between different usages of the same module if it needs to. That's subject to change if Larry decides differently, of course, but I don't see it getting anything other than more specified, not less. (Which isn't to say that you'll have to specify author and version when you use a module, just that the interpreter will use that data in case one module uses a different version of some module then another module does) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [email protected] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk